Forecast Dutch Parliamentary Election Results > Week 6
Longitudinal Wave
General Information
Title
Week 6
Project Number
167.1.6
Abstract
This is week 6 of the "Tilburg Election Study 2017".
Longitudinal Type
Longitudinal Wave
Begin date
22-02-2017
End date
06-03-2017
Researcher
Arthur van Soest, Jochem de Bresser (TISEM)
Publisher
CentERdata
Copyright
© 2018 CentERdata
Funding Organization
NWO
Data Science Center Tilburg
TiSEM
Data Science Center Tilburg
TiSEM
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-25p-xv9b
Datasets and documentation
View Documentation
Codebook in English
Codebook in Dutch
Data Files
English SPSS file
English STATA file
Variables
| Variable name | Variable Label | Variable Type |
|---|---|---|
| nomem_encr | Number of the household member encrypted | preloaded |
| nf17f001 | Which day of the week does the respondent start? | constructed |
| nf17f002 | How likely is it that you will cast your vote in the general elections on 15 March? | directly measured |
| nf17f003 | Chance of voting for party: I would not cast my vote | directly measured |
| nf17f004 | Chance of voting for party: VVD (Liberal party) | directly measured |
| nf17f005 | Chance of voting for party: PvdA (Labour party) | directly measured |
| nf17f006 | Chance of voting for party: PVV (Party for Freedom) | directly measured |
| nf17f007 | Chance of voting for party: SP (Socialist party) | directly measured |
| nf17f008 | Chance of voting for party: CDA (Christian democratic party) | directly measured |
| nf17f009 | Chance of voting for party: D66 (liberal-democratic party) | directly measured |
| nf17f010 | Chance of voting for party: CU (Christian union party) | directly measured |
| nf17f011 | Chance of voting for party: GL (Green-left party) | directly measured |
| nf17f012 | Chance of voting for party: SGP (Christian reformed party) | directly measured |
| nf17f013 | Chance of voting for party: PvdD (Party for the Animals) | directly measured |
| nf17f014 | Chance of voting for party: 50Plus (pensioners’ interests party) | directly measured |
| nf17f015 | Chance of voting for party: DENK (pro-diversity party) | directly measured |
| nf17f016 | Chance of voting for party: VNL (pro-Netherlands party) | directly measured |
| nf17f017 | Chance of voting for party: other party | directly measured |
| nf17f018 | Chance of voting for party: blank | directly measured |
| nf17f019 | Chance of voting for party: I don’t know | directly measured |
| nf17f020 | Chance of voting for party: I prefer not to say | directly measured |
| nf17f021 | Chance of voting for party: Total (scores must add up to 100%) | directly measured |
| nf17f022 | Which other party do you mean? | directly measured |
| nf17f131 | Sybrand Buma (CDA) is reliable | directly measured |
| nf17f132 | Sybrand Buma (CDA) is competent | directly measured |
| nf17f133 | Sybrand Buma (CDA) cares about me | directly measured |
| nf17f134 | Alexander Pechtold (D66) is reliable | directly measured |
| nf17f135 | Alexander Pechtold (D66) is competent | directly measured |
| nf17f136 | Alexander Pechtold (D66) cares about me | directly measured |
| nf17f137 | Jesse Klaver (Green-left party) is reliable | directly measured |
| nf17f138 | Jesse Klaver (Green-left party) is competent | directly measured |
| nf17f139 | Jesse Klaver (Green-left party) cares about me | directly measured |
| nf17f140 | Lodewijk Asscher (PvdA) is reliable | directly measured |
| nf17f141 | Lodewijk Asscher (PvdA) is competent | directly measured |
| nf17f142 | Lodewijk Asscher (PvdA) cares about me | directly measured |
| nf17f143 | Emile Roemer (SP) is reliable | directly measured |
| nf17f144 | Emile Roemer (SP) is competent | directly measured |
| nf17f145 | Emile Roemer (SP) cares about me | directly measured |
| nf17f146 | Not applicable, the debate hasn’t taken place yet | directly measured |
| nf17f147 | I saw (parts of) the debate live on television | directly measured |
| nf17f148 | I saw (parts of) the debate afterwards (e.g. on YouTube) | directly measured |
| nf17f149 | I saw the subsequent discussion about the debate on television | directly measured |
| nf17f150 | I read a subsequent commentary on the debate in the newspaper | directly measured |
| nf17f151 | I heard a subsequent discussion about the debate on the radio | directly measured |
| nf17f152 | I discussed the results of the debate with other people | directly measured |
| nf17f153 | I heard about the results of the debate in another way | directly measured |
| nf17f154 | I haven’t heard or read anything about the results of the debate | directly measured |
| nf17f155 | I don’t know | directly measured |
| nf17f156 | Starting date questionnaire | constructed |
| nf17f157 | Starting time questionnaire | constructed |
| nf17f158 | End date questionnaire | constructed |
| nf17f159 | End time questionnaire | constructed |
| nf17f160 | Duration in seconds | derived |
Questions
Questionnaire: Forecast Dutch Parliamentary Election Results, Week 6
The questionnaire was administered in Dutch
Browse Forecast Dutch Parliamentary Election Results, Week 6Response Information
Response Overview
|
|
2017 |
|||||||
|
Weeks |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
Selected number of household members |
4778 |
4766 |
4749 |
4743 |
4738 |
4713 |
4702 |
4699 |
|
Non-response |
1000 |
977 |
1077 |
1148 |
1077 |
1113 |
1128 |
1406 |
|
Response |
3778 |
3789 |
3672 |
3595 |
3661 |
3600 |
3574 |
3293 |
|
Response percentage |
79% |
80% |
77% |
76% |
77% |
76% |
76% |
70% |
Collection Events
Period
22-02-2017 to 06-03-2017
Sample
A random group of 4833 panel members aged 18 and above, excluding panel members who were already known to be illegible to vote.
Collection Mode
internet survey
Fieldwork Note
A reminder was sent to non-respondents two days before the end of the fieldwork period.