Gender, parenthood and labor market discrimination: a survey experiment > Test

Single Wave Study

General Information

Title
Test
Project Number
175.3
Abstract
In December 2016, panel members within the age range 25-65 who work in paid employment, were asked whether they have experience in decisions concerning hiring new personnel. Part of the panel members who gave us a positive answer were invited to take part in the pre-test for a vignette experiment on labor market discrimination in March 2017. Another part was invited to complete the test in June 2017.
Longitudinal Type
Single Wave Study
Begin date
05-06-2017
End date
29-08-2017
Researcher
Gabriele Mari
Publisher
CentERdata
Copyright
© 2019 CentERdata
Funding Organization
Tilburg University
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-z83-x4cq

Datasets and documentation

View Documentation

Codebook in English
Codebook in Dutch

Data Files

English SPSS file
English STATA file

Variables

Variable name Variable Label Variable Type
nomem_encrNumber of the household member encryptedpreloaded
ob17c_mYear and month of the fieldwork periodconstructed
ob17c040Which advertisement was shown?preloaded
ob17c041CV candidate genderspreloaded
ob17c042Which CVs and orderpreloaded
ob17c043On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how skilled do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c044On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how self-confident do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c045On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how independent do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c046On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how competitive do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c047On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how intelligent do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c048On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how much of an expert do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c049On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how well educated do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c050The candidate will consider work a top priority.directly measured
ob17c051The candidate will be dedicated to the [organization / school].directly measured
ob17c052The candidate will be prepared to make sacrifices for the job.directly measured
ob17c053To what extent, on a scale of 0 to 100 (with 0 being “not at all” and 100 being “definitely”), would you recommend this candidate?directly measured
ob17c054What salary would you recommend if the candidate were hired [by this company / by the school]?directly measured
ob17c055Please indicate how many hours you expect this candidate to work if [he / she] is hired.directly measured
ob17c056On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how skilled do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c057On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how self-confident do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c058On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how independent do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c059On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how competitive do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c060On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how intelligent do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c061On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how much of an expert do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c062On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being “not at all” and 7 being “exceptional”, how well educated do you think the candidate is?directly measured
ob17c063The candidate will consider work a top priority.directly measured
ob17c064The candidate will be dedicated to the [organization / school].directly measured
ob17c065The candidate will be prepared to make sacrifices for the job.directly measured
ob17c066To what extent, on a scale of 0 to 100 (with 0 being “not at all” and 100 being “definitely”), would you recommend this candidate?directly measured
ob17c067What salary would you recommend if the candidate were hired [by this company / by the school]?directly measured
ob17c068Please indicate how many hours you expect this candidate to work if [he / she] is hired.directly measured
ob17c069You have just evaluated two candidates for a job as a software developer. When you think back to the job description at the beginning of this task, was the job:directly measured
ob17c070You have just evaluated two candidates for a job as a teacher at a primary school. When you think back to the job description at the beginning of this task, was the job:directly measured
ob17c071Please recall the two candidates you just evaluated and answer the following questions. The candidates were:directly measured
ob17c072One of the candidates had a child, the other did not.directly measured
ob17c035Was it difficult to answer the questions?directly measured
ob17c036Were the questions sufficiently clear?directly measured
ob17c037Did the questionnaire get you thinking about things?directly measured
ob17c038Was it an interesting subject?directly measured
ob17c039Did you enjoy answering the questions?directly measured
ob17c006Starting date questionnaireconstructed
ob17c007Starting time questionnaireconstructed
ob17c008End date questionnaireconstructed
ob17c009End time questionnaireconstructed
ob17c010Duration in secondsderived

Questions

Questionnaire: Gender, parenthood and labor market discrimination: a survey experiment –Test

The questionnaire was administered in Dutch

Browse Gender, parenthood and labor market discrimination: a survey experiment –Test

Response Information

Response Overview
Selected number of household members: 590 (100.0%)
Non-response: 106 (18.0%)
Response: 484 (82.0%)
Complete: 477 (80.8%)
Incomplete: 7 (1.2%)
Collection Events
Period
05-06-2017 to 25-06-2017
Sample
panel members within age range 25-65, paid employment, works or assists in family business or is autonomous professional, freelancer, or self-employed who answered in December 2016 that they have experience in personnel decision makings
Collection Mode
internet survey
Fieldwork Note
A reminder was sent twice to non-respondents

Period
07-08-2017 to 29-08-2017
Sample
non-respondents of the first measurement
Collection Mode
internet survey
Fieldwork Note
A reminder was sent twice to non-respondents