Solidarity in Health Care

Single Wave Study

General Information

Title
Solidarity in Health Care
Project Number
53
Abstract

In December 2010, the LISS panel completed the questionnaire about solidarity in health care, with the aim of gaining insight into how people view health care in the Netherlands.

 

To determine whether the use of language has any effect on respondents' answers, a section of the respondents was presented the questionnaire phrased in simpler language (version 2).
 
Note that this second version was also fielded in the Immigrant panel.

Longitudinal Type
Single Wave Study
Begin date
06-12-2010
End date
29-12-2010
Researcher
Van Der Houwen, Karolijne
Publisher
CentERdata
Copyright
© 2010 CentERdata
Funding Organization
CentERdata/MESS Project
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-xuz-r5hx

Datasets and documentation

View Documentation

Codebook in English
Codebook in Dutch

Data Files

English SPSS file
English STATA file

Variables

Variable name Variable Label Variable Type
nomem_encrNumber of household member encryptedpreloaded
dv10a_mYear and month of the field work periodconstructed
dv10a001Version number: language useconstructed
dv10a002What do you think are the most pressing problems in our country, today? problem 1directly measured
dv10a003What do you think are the most pressing problems in our country, today? problem 2directly measured
dv10a004What do you think are the most pressing problems in our country, today? problem 3directly measured
dv10a005What do you think are the most pressing problems in our country, today? problem 4directly measured
dv10a006What do you think are the most pressing problems in our country, today? problem 5directly measured
dv10a007Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: Young adultsdirectly measured
dv10a008Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: Elderly peopledirectly measured
dv10a009Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that smokedirectly measured
dv10a010Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that don't smokedirectly measured
dv10a011Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that drink a lot of alcoholdirectly measured
dv10a012Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that don't or hardly drink alcoholdirectly measured
dv10a013Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that have been diagnosed as having a genetic likelihood of developing a serious disease or affliction in the futuredirectly measured
dv10a014Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People with not such good healthdirectly measured
dv10a015Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People with a good healthdirectly measured
dv10a016Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People with low incomedirectly measured
dv10a017Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People with high incomedirectly measured
dv10a018Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that often visit the family physiciandirectly measured
dv10a019Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that rarely or never visit the family physiciandirectly measured
dv10a020Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that don't get enough exercisedirectly measured
dv10a021Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that get enough exercisedirectly measured
dv10a022What do you think should or should not play a role in determining eligibility for a donor organ? How long a person has been waiting for a donor organ.directly measured
dv10a023What do you think should or should not play a role in determining eligibility for a donor organ? How much a person needs a donor organ, from a medical point of view.directly measured
dv10a024What do you think should or should not play a role in determining eligibility for a donor organ? How healthily or unhealthily a person has lived.directly measured
dv10a025What do you think should or should not play a role in determining eligibility for a donor organ? Whether a person personally wants to be an organ donor.directly measured
dv10a026What do you think is the most important consideration in determining eligibility for a donor organ?directly measured
dv10a027What do you think is most important?directly measured
dv10a028If you unexpectedly were to need an organ, would you want to receive an organ from a donor?directly measured
dv10a029Would you want to donate your organs, if you should unexpectedly happen to die?directly measured
dv10a030Will you please indicate for each topic below how satisfied you are? with your life in general?directly measured
dv10a031Will you please indicate for each topic below how satisfied you are? with your standard of living?directly measured
dv10a032Will you please indicate for each topic below how satisfied you are? with your health?directly measured
dv10a033Will you please indicate for each topic below how satisfied you are? with what you are achieving in your life at this moment?directly measured
dv10a034Will you please indicate for each topic below how satisfied you are? with your personal relationships?directly measured
dv10a035Was it difficult to answer the questions?directly measured
dv10a036Were the questions sufficiently clear?directly measured
dv10a037Did the questionnaire get you thinking about things?directly measured
dv10a038Was it an interesting subject?directly measured
dv10a039Did you enjoy answering the questions?directly measured
dv10a040Starting date questionnaireconstructed
dv10a041Starting time questionnaireconstructed
dv10a042End date questionnaireconstructed
dv10a043End time questionnaireconstructed
dv10a044duration in secondsderived

Questions

Questionnaire: Solidarity in Health Care - Version 1 (normal language use)

This questionnaire was originally conducted in Dutch.

Browse Solidarity in Health Care - Version 1 (normal language use)

Questionnaire: Solidarity in Health Care - Version 2 (simple language use)

This version of the questionnaire was also fielded in the Immigrant panel.

This questionnaire was originally conducted in Dutch.

Browse Solidarity in Health Care - Version 2 (simple language use)

Response Information

Response Overview
Selected number of household members: 7041 (100%)
Non-response: 1981 (28.1%)
Response: 5060 (71.9%)
Complete: 5046 (71.7%)
Incomplete: 14 (0.2%)
Collection Events
Period
06-12-2010 to 29-12-2010
Sample
panel members aged 18 years or older.
Collection Mode
internet survey
Fieldwork Note
a reminder was sent twice to non-respondents