Solidarity in Health Care

Single Wave Study

General Information

Title
Solidarity in Health Care
Abstract
In December 2010, the Immigrant panel completed the questionnaire about solidarity in health care, with the aim of gaining insight into how people view health care in the Netherlands.
Longitudinal Type
Single Wave Study
Begin date
06-12-2010
End date
29-12-2010
Researcher
Van Der Houwen, Karolijne
Publisher
CentERdata
Copyright
© 2010 CentERdata
Funding Organization
CentERdata/MESS Project
Cross-Cultural Psychology at Tilburg University
Statistics Netherlands (CBS)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-2bm-zerg

Datasets and documentation

View Documentation

Codebook in English
Codebook in Dutch

Data Files

English SPSS file
English STATA file

Variables

Variable name Variable Label Variable Type
nomem_encrNumber of household member encryptedpreloaded
du10a_mYear and month of the field work periodconstructed
du10a001What do you think are the most pressing problems in our country, today? problem 1directly measured
du10a002What do you think are the most pressing problems in our country, today? problem 2directly measured
du10a003What do you think are the most pressing problems in our country, today? problem 3directly measured
du10a004What do you think are the most pressing problems in our country, today? problem 4directly measured
du10a005What do you think are the most pressing problems in our country, today? problem 5directly measured
du10a006Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: Young adultsdirectly measured
du10a007Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: Elderly peopledirectly measured
du10a008Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that smokedirectly measured
du10a009Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that don't smokedirectly measured
du10a010Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that drink a lot of alcoholdirectly measured
du10a011Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that don't or hardly drink alcoholdirectly measured
du10a012Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that have been diagnosed as having a genetic likelihood of developing a serious disease or affliction in the futuredirectly measured
du10a013Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People with not such good healthdirectly measured
du10a014Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People with a good healthdirectly measured
du10a015Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People with low incomedirectly measured
du10a016Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People with high incomedirectly measured
du10a017Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that often visit the family physiciandirectly measured
du10a018Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that rarely or never visit the family physiciandirectly measured
du10a019Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that don't get enough exercisedirectly measured
du10a020Do you think the premium should stay that way for that group, or not: People that get enough exercisedirectly measured
du10a021What do you think should or should not play a role in determining eligibility for a donor organ? How long someone has been waiting for a donor organ.directly measured
du10a022What do you think should or should not play a role in determining eligibility for a donor organ? How much someone needs a donor organ, from a medical point of view.directly measured
du10a023What do you think should or should not play a role in determining eligibility for a donor organ? How healthily or unhealthily someone has lived.directly measured
du10a024What do you think should or should not play a role in determining eligibility for a donor organ? Whether someone personally wants to be an organ donor.directly measured
du10a025What do you think is the most important consideration in determining eligibility for a donor organ?directly measured
du10a026What do you think is most important then?directly measured
du10a027If you were to need an organ, would you want to receive an organ from a donor?directly measured
du10a028Would you want to donate your organs, if you happen to die?directly measured
du10a029Will you please indicate for each topic below how satisfied you are? with your life?directly measured
du10a030Will you please indicate for each topic below how satisfied you are? with your income?directly measured
du10a031Will you please indicate for each topic below how satisfied you are? with your health?directly measured
du10a032Will you please indicate for each topic below how satisfied you are? with what you are achieving in your life at this moment?directly measured
du10a033Will you please indicate for each topic below how satisfied you are? with your personal relationships?directly measured
du10a034Was it difficult to answer the questions?directly measured
du10a035Were the questions sufficiently clear?directly measured
du10a036Did the questionnaire get you thinking about things?directly measured
du10a037Was it an interesting subject?directly measured
du10a038Did you enjoy answering the questions?directly measured
du10a039Starting date questionnaireconstructed
du10a040Starting time questionnaireconstructed
du10a041End date questionnaireconstructed
du10a042End time questionnaireconstructed
du10a043duration in secondsderived

Questions

Questionnaire: Solidarity in Health Care

This questionnaire was originally conducted in Dutch.

Browse Solidarity in Health Care

Response Information

Response Overview
Selected number of household members: 2360 (100%)
Non-response: 649 (27.5%)
Response: 1711 (72.5%)
Complete: 1706 (72.3%)
Incomplete: 5 (0.2%)
Collection Events
Period
06-12-2010 to 29-12-2010
Sample
panel members aged 18 years or older.
Collection Mode
internet survey
Fieldwork Note
a reminder was sent twice to non-respondents